Reposted from News Punch
According to data collected by the study, 60 percent of people aged
65-years and over have a massively increased risk of death if they
receive the flu shot.
Sharyl Attkisson, former investigative journalist for CBS, says the study highlights how those vaccines may actually be killing lives rather than saving them. Inquisitr.com
reports: In her blog, Attkisson cites a buried JAMA study from almost a
decade ago which showed that there was no improvement in mortality
rates among senior citizens with a flu vaccine, even after greatly
increased vaccination rates. The study “got little attention,” she says,
“because the science came down on the wrong side.”
Whereas the researchers had set out to prove that the push for
massive flu vaccination would save the world, the researchers were
“astonished” to find that the data did not support their presupposition
at all. The data actually shows that deaths increased, not decreased,
among seniors following vaccination.
Johns Hopkins scientist, Peter Doshi, Ph.D., issued a report in the prestigious British Medical Journal, according to NewsLI, asserting that the CDC policy of routinely recommending the flu vaccine is being based on “low quality studies that do not substantiate claims.”
He says there is no evidence that the vaccine reduces deaths among
senior citizens. Interestingly, Doshi cites an Australian study which
found significant risks for children as well, stating that “one in every
110 children under the age of five had convulsions following
vaccinations in 2009 for H1N1 influenza.”
During the drug trials for the Fluzone flu vaccine, 23 seniors out of
3,833 died after receiving the shot, according to the drug’s package
insert, reported by Health Impact News. Another
226 experienced “serious adverse effects.” The manufacturer denies any
connection between the deaths and the flu vaccine.
There appears to be growing public skepticism that the flu vaccine is
as beneficial as the experts say, according to an
earlier Inquisitr report.
The level of doubt is strongly correlated to the incidence of
accounts of research fraud in the vaccine industry, an industry which
makes billions of dollars of profit every year.
Often when an article about the dangers of a vaccine comes out, there
are people who write in to tell about a family member who was harmed by
the vaccine, and the flu vaccine for senior citizens in no exception.
A number of people have written to report that their grandmother, or
uncle, or brother died shortly after getting a flu shot, sometimes after
receiving their first ever such shot.
Their stories are frequently minimized, yet the government pays out
more compensation from the flu vaccine than any other vaccine.
Despite this, it is increasingly expected that every senior citizen line up for their annual flu shot.
A nursing home near Atlanta, Georgia, now reports a devastating outcome to
such a policy, according to Health Impact News. All of the residents of
the Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care were given a flu vaccine on
Friday, November 7. Every one of the senior citizens developed an
immediate fever. Within the week following, five of them died. The
source reports that the facility’s typical pattern is one or two losses
every six months, frequently due to Alzheimer’s.
Questions must be asked, then, such as: do the benefits of getting a
flu vaccine outweigh the risks, especially among vulnerable senior
citizens? Or would they be better off choosing to reject the shot? Who
benefits if evidence showing the harm of the vaccine is buried?
And what would be the motive for fabricating evidence of harm if none
exists? If the facts are as solid as some insist, then why do they seem
to be threatened by the data being challenged? Shouldn’t truth be able
to stand up under scrutiny?