Friday, June 14, 2013

Twelve Reasons To Cut The Canola Oil

Reposted from The Grass Fed Girl
http://www.grassfedgirl.com/12-reasons-to-cut-the-canola/

1. No long term studies have ever been done on the safety of consuming genetically modified canola oil which makes up 80% of the rapeseed crop in the US and Canada.
2. It is rumored that the Canadian government paid the FDA $50 million dollars for canola oil to be granted the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) rating in 1985. Canola oil is not approved by the FDA for use in baby formula.
3. Canola oil is very prone to oxidation during manufacturing and storage causing free radical damage to our DNA which, over time, can lead to various cancers. This means that when canola oil is on the store shelf in bottles or in processed foods like cookies and chips, it is already rancid.
4. Canola oil has been shown to cause heart lesions in animal studies and atherogenic plaques in human arterial walls.
5. Canola oil depletes the antioxidant vitamin E that is needed for cell communication which is helpful in preventing diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Vitamin E is found in greens vegetables, olives, nuts/seeds, coconut oil and avocados.
6. Hydrogenation of canola oil during high heat processing creates a dangerous trans-fat devoid of beneficial Omega-3′s.
7. Eating canola oil accelerates skin aging including wrinkles and liver spots.
8. According to Dr. Mary Enig canola oil can increase risk for insulin resistance which over time leads to diabetes. Processed omega-6 oils like canola oil can stimulate appetite confusing satiety signals.
Just Say No
9.  Canola oil increases the chance of autoimmune diseases where the body attacks its own organs or glands because it increases gut inflammation and permeability (leaky gut).
10. Thyroid function is impaired by eating unsaturated fats like canola oil because our digestive enzymes are compromised so we become unable to break down protein vital for thyroid hormone production. When our metabolism is lowered from poor thyroid hormone production obesity is likely to follow.
11. The oil found in the rapeseed (canola) neutralizes stomach acid preventing the seed from being digested by animals. Low stomach acid prevents the absorption of vitamins and minerals, increasing cravings for sweet and salty junk foods.
12. During the high heat processing, Canola seeds are washed with the toxic chemical solvent hexane (also used in gasoline) for over an hour to extract the oil.
Polyunsaturated fats like canola, soybean and corn oils are commonly used in restaurant cooking because they are very cheap and the public is brainwashed into fearing saturated fat. Another place to watch out for canola oil is in margarine that is marketed as heart healthy such as, Earth Balance or Pam. Corn, cottonseed, soybean, and sunflower oil all have similar deleterious effects on health as canola oil. Ask for your food to be cooked in butter at restaurants and make your own salad dressings at home. Use safe healthy fats like grass fed butter, organic coconut oil, ghee, or cold pressed olive oil from a reputable source. Saturated fats like egg yolks and grass fed beef/lamb can protect against small amounts of canola oil exposure in restaurants, but canola oil is not a oil safe for everyday use. A good guide for which fats to eat can be found here.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

GMO feed turns pig stomachs to mush! Shocking photos reveal severe damage caused by GM soy and corn

Reposted from Natural News
http://www.naturalnews.com/040727_GMO_feed_severe_inflammation_pig_stomachs.html

(NaturalNews) If you have stomach problems or gastrointestinal problems, a new study led by Dr. Judy Carman may help explain why: pigs fed a diet of genetically engineered soy and corn showed a 267% increase in severe stomach inflammation compared to those fed non-GMO diets. In males, the difference was even more pronounced: a 400% increase. (For the record, most autistic children are males, and nearly all of them have severe intestinal inflammation.)

The study was conducted on 168 young pigs on an authentic farm environment and was carried out over a 23-week period by eight researchers across Australia and the USA. The lead researcher, Dr. Judy Carman, is from the Institute of Health and Environmental Research in Kensington Park, Australia. The study has now been published in the Journal of Organic Systems, a peer-reviewed science journal.

The study is the first to show what appears to be a direct connection between the ingestion of GMO animal feed and measurable damage to the stomachs of those animals. Tests also showed abnormally high uterine weights of animals fed the GMO diets, raising further questions about the possibility of GMOs causing reproductive organ damage.

Proponents of corporate-dominated GMO plant science quickly attacked the study, announcing that in their own minds, there is no such thing as any evidence linking GMOs to biological harm in any animals whatsoever. And they are determined to continue to believe that, even if it means selectively ignoring the increasingly profound and undeniable tidal wave of scientific studies that repeatedly show GMOs to be linked with severe organ damage, cancer tumors and premature death.

"Adverse effects... toxic effects... clear evidence"

The study was jointly announced by GM Watch and Sustainable Pulse.

Lead author of the study Dr. Judy Carman stated, "We found these adverse effects when we fed the animals a mixture of crops containing three GM genes and the GM proteins that these genes produce. Yet no food regulator anywhere in the world requires a safety assessment for the possible toxic effects of mixtures. Our results provide clear evidence that regulators need to safety assess GM crops containing mixtures of GM genes, regardless of whether those genes occur in the one GM plant or in a mixture of GM plants eaten in the same meal, even if regulators have already assessed GM plants containing single GM genes in the mixture."

The following photo shows one of the pig intestines fed a non-GMO diet vs. a pig intestine fed a GMO diet. As you can see from the photo, the pig fed the GMO diet suffered severe inflammation of the stomach:



Yet more evidence that GMOs damage mammals

The study adds to the weight of scientific evidence from others studies which show that rats fed a diet of GMOs grow horrifying cancer tumors and suffer premature death.

A scientific study published last year concluded that eating genetically modified corn (GM corn) and consuming trace levels of Monsanto's Roundup herbicide was linked with rats developing shockingly large tumors, widespread organ damage, and premature death.

That study was also criticized by corporate GMO trolls who argued that scientists should not show pictures of rats with large cancer tumors caused by GMOs because the pictures scare consumers into being afraid of GMOs.

Here are some of the pictures they don't want you to see, taken right from the public announcement of the study:



That study also found that rats fed GM corn suffered severe kidney damage as well as shockingly high rates of premature death.

Why weren't these studies done before GMOs were unleashed into the global food supply?

The GMO biotech industry was able to escape any meaningful regulation of GMOs in the United States by (ridiculously) claiming GMOs were substantially no different from non-genetically engineered crops. "They're all the same!" we were told. And the USDA bought it.

So how did Monsanto patent its GM corn, then? You're not supposed to be able to patent something unless it's uniquely different. Thus, the very fact that Monsanto has acquired patents on its GMO crop varieties is proof that the company itself believes its seeds are different.

And what's different about Monsanto's GM corn? It produces a deadly insecticide grown right into every kernel. That insecticide, of course, is what kills insects that try to eat the crop. And how does it kill those insects? It fatally damages their digestive systems. That same insecticide stays inside the corn even as the crop is turned into animal feed... or corn chip snacks... or flaked corn breakfast cereal.

GMOs are unfit for human consumption

This pig stomach inflammation study suddenly provides yet more credible evidence that GMOs are unfit for human consumption and may be causing severe damage to the digestive systems of both humans and mammals.

Naturally, the GMO industry and all its paid online trolls, on-the-take "scientists" and multi-million dollar P.R. machine will try to viciously attack this study from every angle. They absolutely hate real science when that science calls into question their poisonous, deadly seeds and genetic pollution.

That's why you won't read this news anywhere in the mainstream media -- the same media that utterly discredited itself a few weeks ago when it pretended the hugely successful global March Against Monsanto never even took place.

NOTE TO THE SELLOUT CORPORATE MEDIA: You have zero credibility remaining. Virtually no one believes what you print. Everyone knows you have sold out your editorial agenda to Big Pharma, Monsanto, weapons manufacturers and the surveillance state. The reason why alternative media like GM Watch and Natural News is rising while your own numbers keep plummeting is because we print the real news that really matters on liberty, food freedom, farm freedom, health freedom and self-reliance. Maybe if you stopped intentionally lying to your readers on a daily basis while censoring important news on grassroots liberty, you might see some readers return to your publication...



Learn more:
Explanation of the key findings of the Judy Carman study:
http://gmojudycarman.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Clear-English-exp...

Full scientific paper:
http://gmojudycarman.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/The-Full-Paper.pd...

Background on Dr. Judy Carman:
http://www.gmojudycarman.org


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040727_GMO_feed_severe_inflammation_pig_stomachs.html#ixzz2W70blEmL

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Can Niacin Fight Heart Disease?

Reposted from Life Extension
http://blog.lef.org/2013/06/can-niacin-fight-heart-disease.html

Maylin Rodriguez-Paez, RN

Niacin is one of the best kept secrets in the field of medicine, and we’d like to help put an end to that as soon as we possibly can.

Why? Because higher doses of niacin have been shown to maintain blood lipids better than conventional drugs and even help prevent heart attacks.

Below, we’ll explain why niacin is just about one of the best supplements you can take for your heart.

Niacin Increases HDL and Changes LDL Particle Size

Niacin is best known for its ability to increase HDL, a lipoprotein that carries excess cholesterol out of arteries. Having healthy HDL levels is very important for optimal heart health.

In research studies, mean doses of 2.25 grams have been shown to increase HDL by as much as 35%.1 This is quite impressive since most traditional drugs aren’t as effective in raising HDL levels.

Niacin also favorably changes the size of LDL particles. LDL is a lipoprotein that carries cholesterol to the heart and arteries. These particles come in different sizes and each carry a different risk for heart disease.

Larger more buoyant LDL particles are more favorable than smaller particles, which can easily penetrate arterial walls and contribute to plaque. Niacin supports the production of large buoyant LDL particles.2
Niacin also lowers triglycerides. In one study, 1 gram of niacin taken three times a day reduced levels by an average of 26%.3

Niacin Prevents Heart Attacks

In a study called the Coronary Drug Project, taking niacin was found to reduce the incidence of non-fatal heart attacks and strokes by 27% and 26% respectively.3, 4 The participants studied were heart attack survivors.

These results make sense when you take into account that niacin works in several ways to help you maintain a healthy cardiovascular system.

Now ask yourself this: Is there any drug on the market that does all of the things we’ve mentioned above?

Niacin Precautions

Is niacin therapy right for you? We can’t determine that but your doctor can. Higher doses may be appropriate for people with lipid disorders or heart disease.

Are higher doses of niacin dangerous? If taken properly, they shouldn’t be … but it’s certainly not risk free. Again, ask your doctor!

One of the potential side effects of therapy is increased liver enzymes (especially the slow-release preparations). Make sure you monitor your liver function with your doctor.

Higher doses may cause an uncomfortable reaction called the niacin flush. A person may experience itching, redness, and hot flashes. Some describe it like “being on fire.”

Although the niacin flush may seem like a horrible allergic reaction, it really isn’t. It’s caused when your blood vessels dilate and send blood rushing to the surface of your skin.

This reaction is actually the main reason people stop niacin therapy, and we’d rather not have it happen to you.

How to Avoid the “Niacin Flush”

Here are a couple of tips to prevent the niacin flush from happening:

  • Take a full glass of water with your dose and avoid spicy foods.
  • Start therapy with lower doses of niacin (250 mg) and work your way up after a period of several weeks to higher doses. This helps your body get used to the niacin.
  • Take quercetin several hours before taking the niacin or take a baby aspirin prior to use. Both of them can help to minimize the flush.

What About You?

Has niacin therapy ever worked for you? What did you think of niacin before reading this post? Please share your thoughts in the comments!

References:

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar.;35(3):640-646.
  2. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2010 Nov.;8(6):820-830.
  3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8(6):1245-1255.
  4. J. Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jun.;15(2):158-166.

Don't Test Your Cholesterol!

Reposted from Dr. Natasha.com
http://www.doctor-natasha.com/what-should-my-blood-cholesterol-be.php

A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. Mark Twain
Many people ask me a question:
WHEN I TEST MY BLOOD CHOLESTEROL, WHAT SHOULD IT BE?
My answer is:
DON'T TEST YOUR BLOOD CHOLESTEROL!
IT IS A POINTLESS EXERCISE AND A POTENTIALLY HARMFUL ONE!
I will explain, why. Your blood levels of cholesterol are maintained by your liver: when we eat more cholesterol, the liver produces less; when we eat less cholesterol - the liver produces more. That is why low-fat and cholesterol-free diets have no effect on blood cholesterol: your liver will maintain a particular amount of cholesterol in your blood, depending on what your body is doing at the time.

Why does your body need cholesterol?

Our bodies are made out of cholesterol and fats to quite a large degree, and cholesterol is essential for many functions. Cholesterol is such an essential part of our human physiology that the body has very efficient mechanisms to keep blood cholesterol at a certain level at any given moment of your life. However, cholesterol - lowering drugs (statins) are a completely different matter! They interfere with the body's ability to produce cholesterol and hence they do reduce the amount of cholesterol available for the body to use. Let us see just how dangerous that is.

Human brain is hungry for cholesterol!

Every structure in the brain needs cholesterol and saturated fats not only to build itself but also to accomplish its many functions. If you start interfering with the body's ability to produce cholesterol you put the very structure of the brain and the rest of the nervous system under threat. Memory loss and cognitive decline are very common results of statin therapy. In fact it is possible that a considerable part of dementia epidemic in our ageing population is due to our ubiquitous statin prescriptions. Eating fresh eggs and butter daily has been shown to improve memory and cognitive ability in the elderly. Any person with memory loss or learning problems needs to have plenty of these foods every single day in order to recover.
More recently statins have been linked to development of Parkinson's disease. The leading researcher Dr Xuemei Huang from North Carolina University stated: "A surge in Parkinson's disease could be imminent because of the widespread use of statins."
There are people whose bodies are unable to produce enough cholesterol; these people do need to have plenty of foods rich in cholesterol in order to provide their organs with this essential-to-life substance. Low blood cholesterol has been routinely recorded in criminals who committed murder and other violent crimes, people with aggressive and violent personalities, people prone to suicide and people with aggressive social behaviour and low self-control. From the beginning of cholesterol-lowering drug trials increased numbers of deaths from violence and suicide have been recorded. The late Oxford Professor David Horrobin warned us: "reducing cholesterol in the population on a large scale could lead to a general shift to more violent patterns of behaviour. Most of this increased violence would not result in death but in more aggression at work and in the family, more child abuse, more wife-beating and generally more unhappiness." Indeed, one of the fist side effects of statins is the change in mood and personality towards being intolerant, aggressive and short-tempered - a warning sign that the brain is starving for cholesterol.

Cholesterol protects us from infections!

Cholesterol is essential for our immune system to function properly. People with low blood cholesterol are more prone to infections and when they get an infection they are more likely to die from it, compared to people with high cholesterol. Before the discovery of antibiotics mixture of raw egg yolks and cream, very rich in cholesterol, was used as a cure for tuberculosis and other infections for centuries.

Every steroid hormone in the body is made out of cholesterol!

After the brain the organs which are very hungry for cholesterol are our endocrine glands: adrenals and sex glands. They produce steroid hormones, which accomplish a myriad of functions in the body. Without cholesterol we will not be able to cope with stress or to have children.

Cholesterol is essential for babies and children!

The proponents of the diet-heart hypothesis and the public policy makers tell us that our children from the age of two should follow a programme for reducing their blood cholesterol by avoiding natural fats and replacing them with margarine. The pharmaceutical giants are working hard on creating cholesterol-lowering drugs for children. These dangerous guidelines are given out "just in case", without any scientific data to support them. The consequences of this policy can be very serious indeed for our children: aggressive behaviour, learning difficulties, poor memory, poor immunity, poor physical health combined with the future risk of developing cancer, heart disease, stroke and infertility. Children's bodies are generally not able to produce enough cholesterol for growth and development, so eating cholesterol-rich foods is essential for children! That is why human breast milk is very rich in cholesterol!

Cholesterol is essential for the elderly!

Many studies have shown that old people with high cholesterol are healthier and live longer than people with low cholesterol. In fact it is dangerous to reduce cholesterol in old people. And yet that is exactly what our doctors are doing! The older the person is the more their low blood cholesterol poses a risk of stroke, while it has been clearly demonstrated that high blood cholesterol protects older people from strokes, heart disease, infections, cancer and many other health problems.

Vitamin D is made out of cholesterol in the body!

Our recent misguided fear of sun and avoidance of cholesterol have created an epidemic of vitamin D deficiency in the Western world leading to cancer, diabetes, heart disease, mental illness, autoimmune illness, obesity, bone and muscle disease, high blood pressure, chronic pain, poor immunity and susceptibility to infections. As many people are unable to produce enough of their own cholesterol, eating cholesterol-rich foods is essential for them to produce vitamin D.

Cholesterol and saturated fats are essential for healing!

No damage in the body, no wound or scratch can be healed without cholesterol and saturated fats. That is why large-scale studies have found that people who have low levels of cholesterol are prone to cancer, because their bodies cannot heal damaged tissues.
It is this function of healing that brings us back to the testing for cholesterol: all your blood level reflects is how much damage there is in your body at any particular moment, that has to be healed. If you had a cold, an infection, a dental treatment or a surgical procedure, then there is a lot of damage in your body to heal, so your blood cholesterol level will be high until the healing has taken place. If you are tired and under stress, your adrenals have a high demand for cholesterol, as they make their hormones from it. So, your liver has to produce more cholesterol than usual and send it to your adrenals, making blood levels of cholesterol high. In winter cholesterol goes high and in the summer it is generally lower, because cold weather and lack of the sunshine vitamin D places high demands on your immune system, which is very hungry for cholesterol. These are just a few scenarios when your blood cholesterol has to be high to serve your body's needs.
Every day, depending on what your body is doing, your blood cholesterol levels go up and down quite a lot. A blood test for cholesterol will give you a snippet of this activity, completely out of context of your body's needs at the time. If this snippet happens to find it high, then two harmful things can happen to you:
  1. You are likely to be put under pressure to start a statin therapy, depriving your body from one of the most essential nutrients;
  2. You will have to live with a new anxiety - a fear of heart disease! And for no good reason at all, because cholesterol levels in your blood have nothing to do with heart disease.
If you really want to know about your risk of heart disease, then these are the tests to do:
  1. C-reactive protein, which is a marker for inflammation in the body. Heart disease is an inflammatory condition.
  2. Insulin levels in your blood. The insulin profile will show if you suffer from a metabolic syndrome, which is the underlying condition for heart disease.
To learn more about this whole issue (and see all the scientific references), please read my book Put Your Heart In Your Mouth.
Best wishes and speak to you soon,
Dr Natasha

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Tart Cherry

Reposted from Life Extension
http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2013/jun2013_Anti-Inflammatory-Properties-of-Tart-Cherry_01.htm

By Michael Downey
Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Tart Cherry  
On October 17, 2005, the FDA sent out warning letters to cherry growers insisting that they cease making substantiated health claims that specific chemicals found in cherries could reduce pain and inflammation.1,2
The FDA wanted cherry growers to stop citing published scientific studies showing that cherries are packed with unique anthocyanins and other compounds that naturally mediate the inflammatory process.3-6 These compounds deliver comparable anti-inflammatory activity to ibuprofen (Advil®) and naproxen (Aleve®)7—but without the significant side effects!
Standard treatment for muscle pain and inflammation has been with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. With over 111 million prescriptions and accounting for around 60% of over-the-counter pain reliever sales in the USA alone, these are some of the most commonly used types of medications.8 But because they can have deadly side effects, including gastric bleeding, heart attack, and kidney failure, the search for natural agents that could prove more beneficial and safer has gained increased attention.9,10
The compounds found in cherries modulate numerous pathways to protect against other conditions associated with inflammation—including cancer, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease.11-14 For example, tart cherry constituents can switch critical genes off and on;15,16 modulate cell-signaling molecules like tumor necrosis factor;17 and target multiple cardiovascular factors—producing, in one study model, an astounding 65% reduction in early mortality!18
In this article, you will learn of the multiple benefits found in cherries that the FDA did not want to be publicized.

Broad-Spectrum Tart Cherry Compounds

One of nature’s most potent classes of flavonoids is anthocyanins. These powerhouse nutrients are responsible for the deep colors in some berries, fruits, and vegetables. Naturally, like other anthocyanin-rich foods, tart cherries deliver substantial antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity.3-6
But tart cherries are superior because they provide high levels of some novel anthocyanins that are absent from a number of other anthocyanin-rich foods, such as blueberries or bilberries!7
Also, the unique composition of tart cherries goes far beyond anthocyanins.
In fact, tart cherries were shown to contain much higher amounts of total phenolics than even their nutritious cousins, sweet cherries.19 Aside from a greater abundance of anthocyanins, tart cherries also deliver a cast of supporting compounds.
Tart cherries were ranked 14th among the top 50 foods for highest antioxidant content per serving—surpassing such well-known antioxidant sources as red wine and dark chocolate.20
This complex profile prompted researchers to investigate what turned out to be numerous biochemical pathways modulated by tart cherry compounds.3-7,12,21-26
The range of activity was breathtaking. Here’s a partial sampling: bioactive compounds found in tart cherries beneficially inhibit certain enzymes5,7 while boosting others,12,21,22 switch-on cancer defenses,23,24 down-regulate glucose,25 and enhance primary antioxidants.26 We’ll examine this multi-potent network of underlying mechanisms later.
But first, let’s learn about their resulting impact on degenerative conditions—starting with muscle inflammation.

Muscle Protection

Muscle Protection  
High-intensity or prolonged physical activity of any kind typically causes muscle damage, resulting in oxidative stress, inflammation, and pain.27-29
As people age, muscle mass and strength tend to decrease, in a process called sarcopenia.30 Although exercise can help overcome this process, post-exercise pain and loss of strength tend to last much longer.
The observed anti-inflammatory benefits of tart cherries prompted researchers to investigate whether they could be used to protect muscles, lower pain, and accelerate muscle repair.
Research demonstrated that orally administered anthocyanins from tart cherries significantly lowered inflammation-induced pain in rats in a dose-dependent manner3 and that tart cherry juice blend lowered indicators of exercise-induced muscle damage in horses.31
Then researchers turned to controlled human trials, first testing the impact of tart cherries on the degree of pain following intense exercise.
The effects of tart cherry juice consumption were tested in a double-blind, randomized trial of runners participating in a 24-hour relay race. Runners drank two 355 milliliter beverages containing either tart cherry juice or a placebo beverage daily for one week prior to the race and during the race. (Two 355 mL bottles of tart cherry juice daily provides at least 80 mg anthocyanins which is the equivalent of 90 to 100 cherries.)32
Both groups reported pain after the race. But the runners who drank tart cherry juice experienced a substantially smaller pain increase after the race.32 This natural protection against acute muscle soreness suggested that tart cherries must be providing some defense against muscle damage.
To confirm this, scientists conducted a controlled trial on indices of muscle recovery. Participants were given either tart cherry juice or a control drink for five days before, on the day of, and for two days after a marathon race.
Runners in the tart cherry group had significantly lower inflammation biomarkers (Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) compared to the placebo group. The tart cherry group also recovered isometric strength faster than the control runners, demonstrating an accelerated recovery following strenuous exercise.33
To further assess the potential decrease in muscleinjury and strength loss, another research team gave 14 male college students who never exercised 12 ounces of either a tart cherry juice blend or a placebo twice daily for eight consecutive days. Then participants performed a type of repeated arm exercise (elbow flexion eccentric exercise) that typically induces muscle damage. Isometric elbow flexion strength, pain, and muscle soreness were measured before, and for four days after, the protocol.
After 24 hours, the control group’s arm strength was decreased by 30%—while the tart cherry group’s arm strength was diminished by only 12%. After four days, the control group’s arm strength was still down by over 10% while, remarkably, the tart cherry group’s arm strength had increased by 6%!34
The research team concluded that tart cherry significantly reduced the typical pain and loss of strength induced by exercise—and produced marked preservation of muscle function.34
The most recent trial on muscle injury and recovery included ten males, half of whom drank one ounce of a tart cherry beverage twice daily for ten days, while the other half drank the same amount of a placebo beverage during this period. All subjects completed two sets of an intensive, unilateral leg exercise—first, one set with one leg before the ten-day beverage consumption period, and then another set with the other leg after the beverage period.
Faster recovery of the knee extension (maximum voluntary contraction force) was observed with the tart cherry juice protocol versus control. The researchers concluded that the improved muscle recovery time may have been due to attenuation of oxidative damage.35
The study author suggested that tart cherry components produce a significant myoprotective—or muscle-protecting—benefit.35
What You Need to Know
Guard Against Degenerative Disease and Inflammation with Tart Cherries 

Guard Against Degenerative Disease and Inflammation with Tart Cherries

  • Physical exercise can induce muscle damage that generates inflammation and with it, burning, stiffness, and pain. The effect worsens with age.
  • Standard treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen (Advil®) involves potentially deadly adverse effects, such as stroke.
  • Evidence shows that the weave of complex anthocyanins and phenols in tart cherries provides superior protection against muscle injury—by safely inhibiting the pain and inflammatory effects.
  • The potent components in tart cherries have been demonstrated to deliver high-level protection against inflammatory and degenerative diseases, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Joint Defense

Joint Defense  
Experts estimate that one out of every two Americans will develop symptomatic osteoarthritis at some point in their lifetime.36 Osteoarthritis is a chronic condition characterized by a breakdown of joint cartilage that leads to pain and injury.37
The Arthritis Foundation reports that the risk of developing osteoarthritis is greater among those of increased age, those who are athletic or regularly engage in repetitive-motion work, and those who are obese.38
Osteoarthritis has a strong inflammatory component.39 Acetaminophen is the most commonly used osteoarthritis pain medication.40 However, this pain-reliever does not help lower inflammation,40 and its side effects can include kidney or liver damage.41
In a 2007 pilot study, researchers at Baylor Research Institute gave tart cherries in pill form to patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. They documented that, after 8 weeks, more than half the subjects experienced a significant improvement in pain and function.42
Then, in 2012, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine, ahead of publication. Scientists measured the impacts of tart cherry on serum inflammatory biomarkers among inflammatory osteoarthritis patients. (Patients with inflammatory or erosive osteoarthritis are those who suffer from sudden signs of inflammation, such as redness, pain, and swelling.)
The trial included 20 female participants between 40 and 70 years old who experienced at least moderate pain from osteoarthritis. The participants consumed two 10.5-ounce bottles of either tart cherry juice or a control beverage for 3 weeks.
Among those patients consuming the tart cherry juice, there was a statistically significant decrease in inflammation, indicated by reduced levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). The impact was greatest for those women who had shown the highest inflammation levels at the start of the investigation.43
This research demonstrates that tart cherry juice provides osteoarthritis patients with anti-inflammatory activity without the adverse effects and risks of traditional arthritis medications.
Gout is another type of inflammatory arthritis, and it is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and mortality.44 High blood concentration of uric acid is considered its main pathway.45
Typically, drugs such as allopurinol and probenecid are used to help lower uric acid levels. But the side effects of these drugs can include difficulty breathing, unusual bleeding, vomiting, nausea, or severe skin rash.46,47 They may even interfere with other medications.48,49
Fortunately, research has spotlighted a safe alternative. For decades, gout sufferers have consumed tart cherry juice for symptomatic relief, on the basis of anecdotal evidence. Now, rigid science has begun to support this tradition.
A study conducted by scientists at Boston University found that intake of cherry extract reduced the risk of gout attacks in those who suffered recurrent gout attacks by 45%.50 Additionally, the researchers discovered that when cherry intake was combined with allopurinol use, the risk for gout attacks was reduced by 75% versus no intervention. What’s more, these results persisted even across subgroups stratified for sex, obesity status, purine intake, and alcohol use.50 Tart cherries appear to be a natural—and safe—way to inhibit the key gout pathway.

Quelling the Chronic Inflammation of Obesity

Chronic inflammation significantly boosts the risk of a number of conditions, including cancer and heart disease.51 But few people realize that obesity can be both a cause—and a consequence—of chronic low-level inflammation.52,53
Adipose cells are not simply fat stores—they are chemically active cells.52 In obese individuals, belly fat deposits generate a torrent of pro-inflammatory cell-signaling molecules known as cytokines.54 Left unchecked, these cytokines trigger a cascade of destruction that can lead to a number of degenerative diseases.55,56
Researchers demonstrated that obese or overweight human adults who consumed 8 ounces daily of tart cherry juice for4 weeks exhibited significantly lowered inflammation. This was evidenced by marked decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, tumor necrosis factor levels, and monocyte chemotactic protein—all key indicators of inflammation.44
Tart cherries are clearly a potent tool for inhibiting the chronic, often obesity-related, low-level inflammation that can lead to many disorders—and they could even inhibit obesity itself!

Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Elevated readings of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol are a factor in the onset of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases.57
To help decrease low-density lipoprotein to a safer range, the standard medical approach is to prescribe statins or fibrates to decrease blood lipid levels.58 However, some patients encounter side effects with these drugs that range from muscle pain (myalgia) to very serious complications such as liver dysfunction and rhabdomyolysis, a condition in which damaged skeletal muscle is broken down, sometimes resulting in kidney failure.59,60
A series of studies on rats concluded that diets enriched with tart cherries improved multiple cardiovascular risk factors. These included a reduction in cholesterol, body fat, weight, and abdominal fat. Tart cherries also calmed inflammation at sites—such as the belly and heart—specifically linked to heart disease risk.61-63
Then, in 2011, scientists reported a 26% decrease in cholesterol in mice given tart cherry powder, as well as a 65% reduction in early death. This lower mortality was believed to be due to improved cardiovascular health.62
Turning their attention to humans, researchers investigated the impact of tart cherry juice on serum triglycerides. They reported in 2011 that consuming 8-ounce-daily of tart cherry juice lowered triglycerides levels by over 17% on average!44
Together, these studies suggest that tart cherries promote cardiovascular health by safely lowering levels of cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as other risk factors.

Anti-Cancer Mechanisms

Anti-Cancer Mechanisms  
Studies have shown that berry anthocyanins—found in tart cherries—can switch off genes involved in the multiple pathways of cancer.
These include genes for cell proliferation and inflammation, and for angiogenesis (the growth of new blood vessels that feed a tumor).14,64,65
Anthocyanins can also trigger apoptosis, the programmed cell death that causes pre-cancerous cells to self-destruct.64,66
These studies establish that anthocyanins work through a network of mechanisms to promote a broad spectrum of natural anticancer protection. And because there is a unique synergy among the anthocyanins and phenolic acids in tart cherries, scientists have been investigating them for their anticancer benefits.7
In mice, a diet of tart cherries inhibited both the incidence and size of adenomas (benign tumors) of the cecum, an area at the beginning of the large intestine that is a common site for colon cancer. In the same study, the growth of human colon cancer cell lines was shown to be reduced by tart cherry anthocyanins.67
Finally, in 2011, a review of past studies concluded that cherries exert a variety of anti-carcinogenic effects.11
 

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Media Says: No Cure For Heart Disease

Reposted from Life Extension
http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2010/sep2010_No-Cure-for-Heart-Disease_01.htm

By William Faloon
William Faloon
William Faloon
November 2004 issue of Life Extension Magazine®
In response to the failure of quadruple-bypass surgery to keep blood flowing to Bill Clinton’s heart, the Associated Press proclaimed that there is no cure for coronary artery disease.1
As we predicted in the November 2004 issue of Life Extension Magazine®, a lot more than statin drugs would be needed to prevent atherosclerotic plaque from re-occluding the former President’s coronary blood flow.
According to his cardiologist, Bill Clinton did everything right since his 2004 bypass, including eating well, exercising, and keeping his blood pressure and cholesterol in check. Despite this, the bypass graft re-occluded at the beginning of this year, necessitating the insertion of two stents to prop the vessel open.
Mainstream cardiologists were quoted in the media stating that those undergoing coronary artery procedures often have to return every four to five years for tune-ups, i.e., to reopen newly blocked coronary arteries. One cardiac surgeon bragged that he had performed 10 or 15 different stent procedures on the same patient over a period of time.
Bill Clinton’s cardiologist stated that we don’t have a cure for this condition, but we have excellent treatments.
These blatant admissions document the inability of conventional doctors to prevent and reverse atherosclerosis.

Life Extension® Members Know Otherwise

In response to Bill Clinton’s heart attack and subsequent need for bypass surgery in 2004, Life Extension reminded its members that atherosclerosis arises from a chronic condition known as endothelial dysfunction.
We listed the risk factors that cause endothelial dysfunction and described how members could protect against each and every one of them.
The fact that mainstream cardiologists have ‘thrown in the towel’ when it comes to eradicating coronary artery disease reveals how little they pay attention to the published scientific literature.
Life Extension® members long ago were made aware of 17 independent causes of atherosclerotic disease. The diagram on page 16 of this issue outlines each of these correctable cardiac risk factors.

Coronary Artery Disease Can Be Reversed

Coronary Artery Disease Can Be Reverse
Contrary to what mainstream cardiologists say, it is possible to reverse the blockage of blood flow through the coronary arteries. One way is to follow the aggressive lifestyle modification program Dean Ornish, MD has prescribed for decades.
Dr. Ornish and colleagues showed that a regimen that emphasized a very low fat diet, regular exercise, meditation, and avoidance of certain risk factors not only stopped the progression of coronary artery disease, but could reverse it.
This result was demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial, known as the Lifestyle Heart Trial, with data published in The Lancet in 1990. In this study, test subjects were recruited with pre-existing coronary artery disease.2 The patients assigned to Dr. Ornish’s regimen had fewer cardiac events than those who followed standard medical advice.3 What’s more, their coronary atherosclerosis was somewhat reversed, as evidenced by decreased narrowing of the coronary arteries after only one year of treatment. Most patients in the control group, on the other hand, had worsening of their coronary artery blockage at the end of the trial compared to when they started. These favorable results have been replicated by doctors using similar methods (for example, Caldwell B Esselstyn, Jr., MD4 and K. Lance Gould, MD).5
The drawback to Dean Ornish’s program is that it is very restrictive. Participants must avoid all meat and dairy products except egg whites, nonfat milk, and nonfat yogurt; as well as all vegetable oils, nuts, seeds, and avocados. Participants following the Ornish program must supplement with calcium, iron, vitamin B12, and essential fatty acids or deficiencies will develop.
As you’ll read soon, there are other documented ways to maintain healthy coronary artery blood flow that are ignored by most practicing cardiologists.

Dick Cheney Does Opposite of What Dr. Ornish Recommends

Perhaps no living political figure exemplifies poor lifestyle choices and ensuing chronic heart disease better than former Vice President Dick Cheney.
Dick Cheney Does Opposite of What Dr. Ornish Recommends
Former Vice President Dick Cheney on June 1, 2009 in Washington, DC.
Cheney was known for eating outrageous quantities of artery-clogging foods and smoked heavily for 20 years. He almost certainly suffers today from cardiac risk factors that extend beyond his early-life unhealthy habits.
Shortly after Bill Clinton’s coronary stents were inserted this year, Dick Cheney suffered his fifth heart attack. The first occurred in 1978, when he was only 37. He suffered his second in 1984 and a third in 1988 before undergoing quadruple bypass surgery to unblock his arteries. His fourth heart attack occurred in 2000. At that time, doctors inserted a stent to open a re-occluded coronary artery.
In 2001, doctors implanted a device to track and control Cheney’s heart rhythm. In 2008, he underwent a procedure to restore his heart to a normal rhythm after doctors found that he was experiencing a recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Despite all this, Cheney suffered his fifth heart attack in February 2010.
Dick Cheney has reportedly taken statin drugs for nearly two decades. In June 2001, his LDL was an excellent 72 mg/dL, indicating he was taking a high-dose statin drug. This did not, however, prevent him from suffering another heart attack.
The former Vice President has had access to the best that conventional cardiology can offer, yet his chronic heart ailments have not abated.6 Cheney’s multi-decade case history presented the media with another opportunity to declare there is no cure for coronary heart disease, something that Dr. Dean Ornish and many others involved in natural healing vehemently disagree with.

Crestor® Approved by FDA to Reduce C-Reactive Protein

The FDA has given pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca a gift worth tens of billions of dollars by allowing their statin drug Crestor® to be the only medication approved to reduce the risk of heart attack in aging men and women with LDL-cholesterol less than or equal to 130 mg/dL, elevated C-reactive protein greater than or equal to 2 mg/L, and at least one other traditional cardiac risk factor (e.g. hypertension, smoking, or family history).
Life Extension members were warned long ago about the dangers of excess C-reactive protein in the blood. C-reactive protein is a marker of inflammation. Chronic inflammation, as evidenced by high C-reactive protein blood levels, is one cause of atherosclerosis.7-9 Published studies indicate that elevated C-reactive protein may be a greater risk factor than high cholesterol in predicting heart attack and especially stroke risk.10-14
While generic statin drugs and natural therapies have also been shown to reduce C-reactive protein, the FDA has anointed Crestor® as the only approved drug to treat patients with elevated C-reactive protein who also fit certain age and traditional risk factor criteria. This means that Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance companies have to pay over $125 for 30 20-mg tablets of Crestor® as opposed to as little as $7.30 for 30 40-mg tablets of generic simvastatin (brand name Zocor®).
Crestor® is the most potent statin drug, so some people may require 40 mg of simvastatin to achieve the same results as 20 mg of Crestor®. Both of these doses are higher than what is usually needed to lower LDL (low-density lipoprotein). Statin drug side effects are amplified as the dose escalates, so one can expect that those prescribed high-dose Crestor® (to reduce C-reactive protein) will suffer more liver-muscle damage.
An increased risk of type 2 diabetes was recently suggested in statin drug users, which further emphasizes the need to use the lowest effective dose if one chooses to use this class of drug.15 There are other options.

The Phony Health Care Cost Crisis

The Phony Health Care Cost Crisis
The FDA’s gift to AstraZeneca means that only high-cost Crestor® can be advertised and health insurance-reimbursed for the purpose of reducing cardiac risk in patients with a combination of elevated C-reactive protein, “normal” LDL cholesterol, advancing age, and at least one traditional cardiac risk factor like high blood pressure, smoking, and family history. While AstraZeneca enjoys gargantuan profits, taxpayers will be forking over 17 times more than what a generic of probable equal efficacy would cost.
Remember, there is no real health care cost crisis. It is governmental over-regulation of our disease-care system that causes medical prices to be hyper-inflated. Our 500-page book FDA Failure, Deceit and Abuse thoroughly documents this tragedy that politicians still cannot grasp.16
Life Extension has long advocated that those who need statin drugs should use the lowest possible dose. For many people with excess C-reactive protein, the lifestyle modifications you will soon read about (and/or low dose 5-10 mg/day simvastatin) can bring elevated C-reactive protein down to safer ranges.

Too Many Statin Drug Users Suffer Heart Attacks

Pharmaceutical companies have promoted statin drugs as a virtual universal remedy to prevent heart attack. According to conventional guidelines, statin drugs are to be prescribed when LDL blood levels exceed 130 mg/dL and lifestyle modifications like stopping smoking and losing weight fail to bring LDL cholesterol to an optimal level.
Life Extension has long argued that LDL levels should be kept below 100 mg/dL in healthy people to optimally protect against atherosclerosis. In certain high-risk cardiac patients, LDL levels need to be suppressed below 70 mg/dL.
The high dose used in the Crestor® study pushed median LDL level down 50% to a low of 55 mg/dL from a median of 108 mg/dL at baseline and it reduced C-reactive protein by 37%. Despite these impressive reductions in two proven cardiac risk factors, a significant number of subjects taking Crestor® still suffered “major cardiovascular events.”17 This further exposes the fallacy of relying only on statin drugs to maintain healthy arterial blood flow. Remember Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney took statin drugs for years, but their coronary arteries re-occluded anyway.
Crestor® will soon be promoted as a panacea for heart attack prevention. What will not be disclosed in drug advertising, however, is that more than half of the major cardiovascular events in the Crestor® study would occur despite the high-dose use of this drug. In statistical terms, while Crestor® reduced the relative risk of the combined endpoint of heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes by 47%, the majority (53%) of these cardiovascular endpoints in this high-risk study group would still take place! What this means is that if you have cardiac risk factors and rely solely on a high-dose statin drug, you are still at significant risk of suffering a heart attack.

Why Crestor® Failed to Protect All the Study Subjects

There are at least 17 independent risk factors involved in the development of atherosclerosis and subsequent heart attack and stroke. Statin drugs do not come close to correcting all of these risk factors. Based on the findings from the Crestor® study, it is obvious that even when LDL (and total cholesterol) is reduced to extremely low levels, too many people still suffer a major cardiovascular event.
This study will nonetheless be the basis of a national advertising campaign to tout Crestor®. An analysis of the study findings, however, documents the critical need to correct all known cardiovascular risk factors (including elevated LDL, total cholesterol, and C-reactive protein).
We are not vilifying the proper use of statin drugs. For many people with stubbornly high LDL and C-reactive protein levels, they represent an important weapon against arterial disease. Our emphasis is that statin drugs are not the only way to lower LDL and C-reactive protein, and they should not be relied on as the only approach to protect against atherosclerosis.

Reducing C-Reactive Protein Requires a Multimodal Approach

Life Extension has reviewed thousands of C-reactive protein blood test results over the years. Our consistent observation is that overweight and obese individuals have stubbornly elevated C-reactive protein levels.18 Our findings were confirmed in a recent study that showed overweight and obese individuals are far more likely to have elevated C-reactive protein. In fact, obese people are three times more likely to have elevated C-reactive protein levels than normal-weight individuals.19,20
C-reactive protein is a marker of chronic inflammation. A large body of evidence correlates chronic inflammatory reactions with the increased risks of cancer,21-23 stroke,24 heart attack,25-27 and dementia.28 People who accumulate excess body fat suffer sharply higher incidences of all these diseases, further validating the importance of maintaining C-reactive protein at optimal ranges.
Reducing C-Reactive Protein Requires a Multimodal Approach
In the Crestor® study, median C-reactive protein levels were 4.2 mg/L in the Crestor® group, and 4.3 mg/L in the placebo group at baseline.17 Obese individuals can have C-reactive protein levels that are easily double this.29 The biological challenge in overweight people is to combat the excess C-reactive protein made directly by fat cells (adipocytes) and the C-reactive protein made in the liver in response to excess amounts of interleukin-6 expressed in abdominal fat that is dumped directly into the liver.
Since obese and overweight individuals spew out C-reactive protein from their liver and fat cells, it is often challenging to bring this lethal inflammatory compound (C-reactive protein) into safe ranges.
We are impressed with the data from the Crestor® study showing the reduction in C-reactive protein and major cardiovascular events. Our decade-long evaluation of C-reactive protein blood results, however, prompts us to warn that it will require more than statin drugs to suppress dangerously high C-reactive protein levels prevalent in so many individuals.
The good news is that low-cost nutrients and hormones, along with dietary changes, can work as well as statins in reducing deadly C-reactive protein.
 

Vitamin C Reduces C-Reactive Protein

Soon after the media put the Crestor® clinical trial on the front pages, a study was published showing that 1,000 mg a day of vitamin C reduces C-reactive protein as effectively as some statin drugs.19
In this University of California Berkeley study, participants who received vitamin C and started out with C-reactive protein levels greater than 2 mg/L had 34% lower levels compared with the placebo group after only two months.19,20
This study was done based on previous findings that vitamin C supplements reduce elevated C-reactive protein. This study received scant media coverage.

A Healthy Diet Significantly Reduces C-Reactive Protein

Eating too much saturated fat or high-glycemic carbohydrates increases C-reactive protein.30,31 One study showed a 39% decrease in C-reactive protein levels after only eight weeks of consuming a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol.32 The study participants also saw reductions in their LDL, total cholesterol, body weight, and arterial stiffness.
A Healthy Diet Significantly Reduces C-Reactive Protein
So while you may soon see ads promoting the 37% C-reactive protein reduction in response to high dose Crestor®, you should be aware that the same benefit has already been shown in response to healthier eating—with no drugs used.
For those who cannot adequately control their food intake, the lipase-inhibitor drug orlistat reduces absorption of dietary fat by 30%.33 A drug called acarbose reduces the number of absorbed carbohydrate calories by inhibiting the glucosidase enzyme.34,35 Both of these drugs lower LDL, triglycerides, glucose, cholesterol and other cardiac risk factors when taken before each meal.34-41 There are over-the-counter dietary supplements that exhibit some of these same effects.
Another study shows that eating cholesterol-lowering food works about as well as consuming a very low-fat diet plus statin drug therapy. One study showed a 33.3% reduction in C-reactive protein and 30.9% reduction in LDL in subjects eating a very low-fat diet and taking a statin drug. Those who ate the cholesterol-lowering foods showed a 28.2% reduction in C-reactive protein and a 28.6% reduction in LDL.42 This study showed that eating cholesterol-lowering foods achieved almost the same benefit as those who followed a very low-fat diet and took a statin drug.
The cholesterol-lowering foods used in this study include almonds, soy protein, fiber, and plant sterols.42 Few people can follow a rigorous low-fat diet and some people want to avoid statin drugs. Based on this study, those who need to reduce LDL and/or C-reactive protein blood levels can accomplish this by eating cholesterol-lowering foods or taking supplements such as soluble fiber powder before heavy meals.
In a study of 3,920 people, subjects who ingested the most dietary fiber were found to have a 41% lower risk of elevated C-reactive protein levels, compared with those who ate the least fiber. The doctors who conducted this study concluded: “Our findings indicate that fiber intake is independently associated with serum CRP concentration and support the recommendation of a diet with a high fiber content.”43
There is an important take-home lesson here for those with high C-reactive protein levels that persist even after initiating statin drug therapy. You may be able to achieve significant additive benefits by making dietary modifications, taking at least 1,000 mg of vitamin C each day, and following other proven ways to quell chronic inflammatory reactions.

Sex Hormones and Inflammation in Men

Aging men are plagued with declining testosterone levels while their estrogen remains the same or even increases. This imbalance often sets the stage for a host of chronic inflammatory disorders, while increasing the amount of abdominal adiposity.
For years, we at Life Extension have advised maturing men to restore their free testosterone to youthful ranges (between 20 and 25 pg/mL of blood) and keep their estrogen from getting too high. Ideal estrogen (estradiol) levels in men have been shown to be between 20 and 30 pg/mL of blood.
Dietary Supplements That Suppress Inflammation
Chronic inflammation is the result of a host of underlying pathologic processes. While statin drugs help suppress these inflammatory events, dietary supplements function via additional mechanisms to suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein. Here is a partial list of nutrients that have demonstrated effects in suppressing chronic inflammatory reactions:
  • Curcumin44-48
  • Irvingia49-51
  • Vitamin K52-54
  • Luteolin55-57
  • Fish oil58-64
  • Borage oil (source of gamma-linolenic acid)65,66
  • Acetyl-L-carnitine67-71
  • Vitamin C72-76
  • Theaflavins77-82
  • Soluble fiber83-86
  • Coenzyme Q1087,88
  • Isoflavones89
We have seen countless cases of men with chronic inflammation experience a reversal of their elevated C-reactive protein (and painful symptoms) when a youthful sex hormone profile is properly restored. Independent published studies corroborate our findings that low testosterone and high estradiol predisposes aging men to chronic inflammatory status and higher C-reactive protein.90-92

Pomegranate Restores Coronary Artery Blood Flow

In stating that there is “no cure for heart disease,” the media never bothered to look at the scientific literature, where there is a host of documented natural approaches to reverse clinical markers of atherosclerosis.
Pomegranate Restores Coronary Artery Blood Flow
In one study, doctors tested a group of heart disease patients to ascertain pomegranate’s effects on inducible angina and the rate of blood flow through the coronary arteries. The entire group was given a baseline stress test to induce angina and an advanced diagnostic technique to measure coronary blood flow.
One group of cardiac patients received their medications plus placebo, while the second group received their medications plus pomegranate juice. After three months, coronary blood flow was again measured using the same tests performed at baseline. In the group receiving the pomegranate juice, stress-induced angina episodes decreased by 50%, whereas stress-induced angina increased by 38% in the placebo group.97
When measuring coronary artery blood flow, the placebo group worsened by 17% after three months, whereas coronary blood flow improved by 18% in the pomegranate group.
This study showed that daily consumption of pomegranate can improve blood flow to the heart in coronary artery disease patients in a relatively short period of time. The doctors noted that the test they used to measure coronary blood flow was shown to be the best predictor of future heart attack risk.
Another study compared one group of patients receiving statin and other drugs to a group who received the same drugs plus pomegranate juice. In the drugs-only group, a measurement of systemic atherosclerosis (carotid intima-media thickness) increased by 9% in a year, whereas the group receiving the drugs plus pomegranate showed a 35% reversal in carotid intima-media thickness.98
One way that pomegranate protects cardiovascular health is by augmenting nitric oxide, which supports the functioning of endothelial cells that line the arterial walls.99 Nitric oxide signals the vascular smooth muscle to relax, thereby increasing blood flow through arteries and veins. In the aforementioned study, pomegranate also protected against atherosclerosis by reducing LDL’s basal oxidative status by an astounding 90% and increasing beneficial paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) by 83%.98
Pharmaceutical companies would pay a lot for a patented compound that performs as well as pomegranate. If such a compound were developed, you would see national TV ads promoting it as the “drug” every American should take to protect against heart attack. Fortunately, pomegranate is a low-cost dietary supplement. You won’t see it advertised by the mass media, but then again, you don’t have to pay inflated prescription drug prices for it.
Avoid Foods Cooked at High Temperatures
What one eats plays a major role in chronic inflammatory processes. Cooking foods at temperatures greater than 250 degrees Fahrenheit results in sugars and certain oxidized fats reacting with proteins to form glycotoxins in the food.93 Consuming foods high in glycotoxins can induce a low-grade, but chronic state of inflammation.94 In addition, the glycotoxins in food cooked at high temperatures also promote the accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in our living tissues, which results in an accelerated aging process.95,96

Coronary Artery Occlusion May Be Controlled with Other Nutrients

Kyolic® garlic,100-102 GliSODin™ (oral superoxide dismutase complex),103,104 fish oil,105-108 and cocoa polyphenols109-114 have all been shown to improve clinical markers of arterial blood flow.
An interesting study compared statin drugs side-by-side with fish oil in patients with heart failure. After a median of 3 years of follow-up, fish oil showed more benefit than statin therapy.115 Fish oil helps promote a shift from small, dense LDL particles (more atherogenic) to larger, “fluffier” LDL particles (less atherogenic), and it functions by numerous other mechanisms to protect against heart attack.116,117 Furthermore, the data showing reduction in sudden cardiac death with omega-3 fatty acids (like fish oil) is far more robust and consistent than what has been found in statin drug clinical trials.118,119
Unlike side effect-prone statin drugs, fish oil seems to help protect against virtually every age-related degenerative disease.107,120-124 Those with LDL levels above 100 mg/dL of blood who cannot lower it with dietary changes or supplements should consider a low dose statin drug and fish oil.

Simple Guidelines to Protect Yourself Against Heart Attack and Stroke

At the end of this article is a reprint of our 17 “daggers aimed at the heart” diagram that represents independent risk factors associated with heart attack and stroke. Any one of these daggers can create vascular disease. Regrettably, aging people often suffer multiple risk factors (daggers aimed at their heart) that cause them to die prematurely.
Fortunately, the proper blood tests can identify risk factors unique to each individual so that corrective action can be taken before one’s heart or brain is decimated by a catastrophic vascular event. To view the optimal blood levels of cardiac risk markers you should seek to attain, log on to www.lef.org/heart. A review of this website reveals a wide range of lifestyle, nutrient, hormone, and drug choices available. If you don’t want to take drugs, plenty of natural alternatives exist. Some people will need to take drugs, however, to get into optimal ranges.
Multiple studies document that a chronic inflammatory process is directly involved in the degenerative diseases of aging including cancer,125-127 dementia,128-130 stroke,131-133 visual disorders,134,135 arthritis,136-138 liver failure,139,140 and heart attack.141-146
Homocysteine and C-Reactive Protein as Risk Factors For Atherosclerosis
The media attacked the use of B-complex vitamins because they did not reduce the risk of heart attack in a clinical study.188 As Life Extension pointed out long ago, it’s not the type of nutrient, hormone, or drug that determines clinical outcomes. What matters are the achieved blood levels that occur in response to taking a compound designed to reduce disease risk.
A different study analyzed blood levels of homocysteine and C-reactive protein in heart attack patients compared with a control group who had no symptoms of heart attack. The groups were matched for serum cholesterol, HDL, triglycerides, age, sex, body mass index, and blood pressure. The results showed that compared with the control patients:
  • 32% more heart attack patients had homocysteine levels above 10 µmol/L
  • 500% more heart attack patients had homocysteine levels above 15 µmol/L
  • 572% more heart attack patients had C-reactive protein levels above 3.00 mg/L
This study demonstrates the importance of keeping homocysteine below 10 µmol/L (optimal levels are below 7-8 µmol/L) and C-reactive protein as low as possible (optimal levels are below 0.55 mg/L for men and 1.5 mg/L for women).189
Fortunately, a low-cost C-reactive protein blood test can identify whether you suffer a smoldering inflammatory fire within your body that will likely cause you to die prematurely. An abundance of scientific research provides a wide range of proven approaches to suppress chronic inflammatory reactions.147-165
The comprehensive Male and Female Blood Test Panels reveal your C-reactive protein level, along with other factors that could cause your C-reactive protein to be too high. Blood components that can spike C-reactive protein levels include high LDL,166 low HDL,167 low testosterone168 and excess estradiol (in men),169 elevated glucose,170,171 excess homocysteine,172 and DHEA deficit.173
Optimal blood levels of C-reactive protein are below 0.55 mg/L in men and below 1.50 mg/L in women.174-177 Standard reference ranges accept higher levels as normal because so many people fail to take care of themselves and thus suffer chronically high C-reactive protein levels with subsequently increased risk of heart attack,178-180 stroke,181,182 cancer,125,183 senility,184,185 etc.186
Dangers of Relying on the Media for Health Information
Click to view
This image depicts daggers aimed at a healthy heart. Any one of these daggers would kill if thrust deep into the heart. In the real world, however, aging humans suffer small pricks from the point of these daggers over a lifetime. The cumulative effect of these dagger pricks (risk factors) is arterial occlusion and, far too often, angina or acute heart attack.
Despite the media portraying cardiac stents as the best choice for those with coronary blockage, a 2007 trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine evaluated 2,287 patients over 5 years and found that stents provided no additional benefit over drug cocktails in patients with chronic stable angina (chronic stable coronary artery disease). The study found that stent placement did not affect heart attack risk or coronary mortality.187 Yet these procedures continue to be very popular due to the reimbursement potential ($15,000 per procedure) offered by stent placement to cardiologists.
The fact that conventional drug cocktails, bypass grafting, and stents provide such limited benefits emphasizes the need for a comprehensive program to correct all 17 independent cardiac risk factors.

Dangers of Relying on the Media for Health Information

Today’s news media function as a mouthpiece for the conventional medical establishment.
It is in the economic interests of mainstream cardiology to deceive the public into believing the only way of treating heart disease is with bypass surgery, stents, and drugs.
A plethora of published data, however, reveals that aging humans can successfully circumvent the lethal atherosclerotic process and in many cases reverse it. It all starts with comprehensive blood testing.
The medical establishment charges around $1,000 for the wide-ranging blood tests needed to assess coronary risk markers. As a Life Extension member, you can obtain the same tests for only $269.
When you place your blood test order, we send you a requisition form along with a listing of blood-drawing stations in your area. You can normally walk in during regular business hours for a convenient blood draw.
To place your order for the comprehensive Male and/or Female Blood Test Panels, call 1-800-208-3444 or visit www.lef.org/blood.
Dick Cheney Suffers Congestive Heart Failure
This article was written in early year 2010. As we go to press, former Vice-President Dick Cheney was hospitalized again, this time with progressive fluid retention diagnosed as congestive heart failure. He underwent yet another round of surgery that involved the implantation of a small pump called a Left Ventricular Assist Device. This device is placed in patients whose heart failure is so bad that they need mechanical assistance to sustain life. The failure of conventional cardiology is self-evident. I urge members to take preventative steps to reduce their risks of sudden cardiac arrest, or the agonies of repeated surgical procedures that don’t correct the underlying causes of coronary occlusion and heart muscle impairment.
For longer life,
For Longer Life
William Faloon